diff --git a/topics/02_passive/images/full_wetsuit_scan.jpg b/topics/02_passive/images/full_wetsuit_scan.jpg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3750abe2ca7e36fcb6383ddff3cb3819892d1601
Binary files /dev/null and b/topics/02_passive/images/full_wetsuit_scan.jpg differ
diff --git a/topics/02_passive/index.md b/topics/02_passive/index.md
index eee13dac455447aa02f04e8cd376e9a66f25562f..5b806aaf8939dd4c7b8f8dbfc6bf56cfb91730b4 100644
--- a/topics/02_passive/index.md
+++ b/topics/02_passive/index.md
@@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ Light conditions in the scene are crucial to the quality of the scan. A controll
 2. Precision Limitations
  Increasingly industry pairs vision systems for photogrammetry with laser systems to balance the benefits of both.
 
+ <img src="images/full_wetsuit_scan.jpg" alt="Self Assembly Lab">
+ <small>Photogrammetry scan using Polycam, 2m range, 3 circular passes around the mannequin. ~2 minute process to get the result.
+ On the left, rendered view, on the right, the untextured mesh.</small>
+
 
 # Software