diff --git a/topics/02_passive/images/full_wetsuit_scan.jpg b/topics/02_passive/images/full_wetsuit_scan.jpg new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..3750abe2ca7e36fcb6383ddff3cb3819892d1601 Binary files /dev/null and b/topics/02_passive/images/full_wetsuit_scan.jpg differ diff --git a/topics/02_passive/index.md b/topics/02_passive/index.md index eee13dac455447aa02f04e8cd376e9a66f25562f..5b806aaf8939dd4c7b8f8dbfc6bf56cfb91730b4 100644 --- a/topics/02_passive/index.md +++ b/topics/02_passive/index.md @@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ Light conditions in the scene are crucial to the quality of the scan. A controll 2. Precision Limitations Increasingly industry pairs vision systems for photogrammetry with laser systems to balance the benefits of both. + <img src="images/full_wetsuit_scan.jpg" alt="Self Assembly Lab"> + <small>Photogrammetry scan using Polycam, 2m range, 3 circular passes around the mannequin. ~2 minute process to get the result. + On the left, rendered view, on the right, the untextured mesh.</small> + # Software